Democrats For Change
Questions abound in this political season finding very few answers. It’s no secret that politicians have always been slippery when it comes to straight answers, but the present crop of Democrats has reached a new low. They no longer feel the need to give specific answers to important questions making it virtually impossible to vote for them based on issues. Instead, they rely in vague euphemisms and emotional stunts. They use phrases like, “the need for change.”
What exactly does that mean, and why is it tossed about like some holy nugget?
The word “change” is made to order for the politician bent on concealing their agenda or lack of ideas. They toss the phase into a crowd of voters with the hope each will insert their own personal thought of what change should be. As expected, many will mistakenly assume that the politician agrees with them thus garnering allegiance. This is a very clever tactic and worthy of the deceptive nature of a politician.
When no clear specifics are offered you can bet skullduggery is afoot. By talking in abstracts, how can we be certain that the good of the country is their chief concern and not just the wish to fulfill their own selfish desire for power? To date, all of the present Democrat candidates have displayed a deceitful nature and lack of moral fiber. In these dangerous times I would be negligent not to at least wonder how we can trust or even expect any of them to do what is best for the country.
At this point we might apply the old saying, “What we permit, we allow.” If we permit political candidates to win by expressing only vague ideas on their quest for the most powerful position in the land, then we allow the door to remain open for our own destruction.
If a candidate cries out for change and doesn’t tell us specifically what kind of change they have in mind, then they don’t deserve your vote.