Lord Crimson

Wisdom from the Realm

Nancy Pelosi defends Charlie Rangel

with 5 comments

After news broke that the House ethics committee plans to admonish  Rep. Charlie Rangel for violating House rules, Speaker Nancy Pelosi immediately came to Rangel’s rescue, once again.

No surprise here since in the past Pelosi has been Rangel’s most prominent defender through his many tax evasion episodes – thieves sticking together and all that.

“I think that every member is entitled to have his day before the ethics committee,” she said. “They have said he did not knowingly violate the rules. And, again, if this were the end of it, that would be one thing. But there’s obviously more to come and we’ll see what happens with that. But every member has that right.”

Pelosi said, “All I saw was the press release where it said he didn’t violate the rules of the House.” She noted that the report said Rangel didn’t know he was violating rules that applied to a lobbyist-funded trip to the Caribbean.

Pelosi pointed out that the ethics committee found that Rangel’s staffers knew corporate money was paying for trips even though Rangel claims he didn’t.

“I think it’s quite a statement to hold members accountable for what their staffs knew,” she said. “I’ll be interested to see how that reverberates.”

Typical Charlie Rangel to go with the twofer “ignorance” and “the staffer did it” defense.

Pelosi failed to mention whether Rangel should stay on as chairman of the Ways and Means Committee, but this might be a good time to remind her about the promise of the most ethical administration ever.

“Obviously they have other issues to deal with,” Pelosi said. “We’ll just see what happens next and what comes out of the ethics committee.”

John Murtha could not be reached for comment.


Written by Lord Crimson

February 26, 2010 at 3:52 pm

5 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Rangel can’t manage his own personal affairs without raising legal and ethical questions. How can we possibly trust him to manage the American people’s affairs?

    We can’t!


    February 26, 2010 at 8:48 pm

  2. The sad reality about Rangel is no matter what he does, he will never be voted out by the sheeple in Harlem.

    Lord Crimson

    February 27, 2010 at 7:46 am

  3. Pelosi and Rangel are shining examples of the need for term limits.

    Darth Sam

    February 27, 2010 at 5:04 pm

  4. It’s time to drain the swamp beginning with Charlie Rangel.


    March 1, 2010 at 7:43 am

  5. Politics is a field where in the majority o cases only very shrewd and smart people may feel comfortable and the pair of these two bears the fact out.

    dana @ Israel

    July 12, 2010 at 6:52 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: