by Lord Crimson
After Obama delivered his lies and cliché-ridden speech in Copenhagen to his joy and delight he found someone he could bow to.
He must have been ecstatic at his good fortune.
With all the political scum and villainy gathered around him I’m surprised that he only bowed once.
Excuse me while I wipe the tears of laughter from my eyes.
Good Grief!
A mysterious Muslim group with unknown sponsors has purchased building steps away from where the World Trade Center once stood (Ground Zero) in order to turn it into potentially one of the largest New York City mosques.
At the moment. the old Burlington Coat Factory building already serves as a mini-mosque.
The Imam, Feisal Abdul Rauf, told the New York Times that he has assembled several million dollars to turn it into ‘’an Islamic center near the city’s most hallowed piece of land that would stand as one of ground zero’s more unexpected and striking neighbors.’’
Records show that the 61-year-old Imam paid $4.85 million in cash for it along with 50,000 square feet of air rights and enough financing. Rauf plans an ambitious project of $150 million, he said, akin to the Chautauqua Institution, the 92 Street Y or the Jewish Community Center.
The countries of origin that supplied the financing has not been revealed. Most US mosques, including many in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx are funded directly or indirectly by Saudi Arabia the country to which 15 of the 19 hijackers who bombed the World Trade Center belonged. The UAE, Qatar and Iran are other major sponsors across the USA.
A spokesman for Mayor Michael Bloomberg, Andrew Brent gave the statement, “If it’s legal, the building owners have a right to do what they want.”
Is that so? In that case if Political Correctness and stupid politicians are allowed to win out the only thing left to do is allow the mysterious Muslim group to spend billions if necessary to build the grandest Mosque in all the land. After it is finished slam two jet planes destined for the Middle East into it.
Four would be better.
Nick covers climate change fraud with extreme clarity and insight. Can’t ask for much more than that.
Who is really in command?
A reasonable question considering that in every situation Obama reacts like he hasn’t got a clue.
He has vacated the writing of the health care bill to Nancy Pelosi’s House of Representatives. In turn and to the detriment to the nation, she has farmed the writing out to several extremely radical community action groups. As a result, Obama seems not to know or understand the details about his “own” health care plan or to demonstrate any leadership on the issue.
With respect to Afghanistan, climate change and the rest of our foreign policy, he is equally lost, especially when it comes to dealing with other world leaders. He makes beautiful and empty speeches, which results in the failure to cut beneficial deals for the nation.
It’s like the more you watch the man, the more you see a person who is the face of some other entity or group. He appears in public as your typical figurehead whose strings are being pulled by others. Obama may be the voice, but there is no way he is in command.
We know that he has been and remains surrounded by life-long radicals, professed communists and anti-capitalists, some of whom he has appointed as czars in his administration. The fact that there are now thirty-six czars should raise red flags. Is Obama picking the czars or someone else? You must at least wonder the necessity of appointing czars in the first place, and for what purpose?
OK, you may be right that I am just whistling past the grave yard. Mainly because there is no one person visible at the moment playing puppet master… except maybe George Soros.
Does Obama look like a man who knows what he is doing? Have you seen one firm conviction or even something he believes in? The more he talks, the more empty words he delivers. The platitudes he spouts about America and the American people simply do not ring true. He reads necessary sentences, but no ideas he actually believes. The sinister part is while Obama doesn’t have a single strong conviction, the men behind the scenes clearly do. They are manipulating this country down a dangerous path while their front man attempts to distract us from the ride.
Granted, this sounds like some kind of paranoid conspiracy theory. Normally, I might even agree because I don’t want to believe our leaders are capable of such deception. But how can we not question the recent events that are not and never have been normal operating procedures.
Why Barack Obama?
First, you need a black man to gain the support of the vast black minority who allies himself with the poor and down-trodden. Next, you need a pale-skinned black man so he can be more palatable to white Americans. You know – someone that gives the white guilt crowd somewhere to appease their guilt. And you need someone who speaks well enough to co-opt the language of the right and appear to be someone who can unite.
This is the kind of man you would pick to be your voice so that while you move things drastically left, the vast majority of Americans will not believe that was the intention of the moderate-appearing puppet.
You would pick someone you could promote as clever enough for all this to be his idea. A person trained more than driven by a personal sense of commitment. Obama is and has been surrounded by radical left wing activists for 20-30 years. These people have deeply ingrained commitments to changing the system and have been actively trying to do so for all that time. These people would have a difficult time getting elected, but not Obama.
Is Obama Pre-programmed?
Seems like an odd question until you remember how such occurrences have happen in the past. Even today we don’t have to look any further than the much touted sleeper-cells to realize such a thing is indeed possible.
All we have to do is look at how easy Obama’s successes have materialized. I mean Harvard Law Review without publishing a single noteworthy paper. You might wonder or even ask who exactly paid for his carefully cultivated Ivy League education.
For a brief time he served as a community organizer, Professor, State Legislator and Senator. I’m sure that it is just a coincidence each position lasted just long enough to build a resume. Then as “luck” would have it a freshman US Senator was chosen to be the convention key-note speaker, then literally handed the presidency of the US. How does that happen? A person with zero administrative experience is running the entire government of the United States? To top that off rewarded with a Nobel Peace Prize for doing what… being arrogant.
Ask yourself, have you seen this level of activity in the first year of any other administration in your lifetime? Frankly, given his background and accomplishments, or the lack thereof, does Obama seem like a man who could manage all he has taken on?
An emphatic no is the correct answer… yet with the help or protection of a leftist media the destruction continues. Look at all the recent events not reported in order to protect and deflect criticism. The climate change fraud is the most recent example skimmed over as if it were a lost dog.
You can disregard the possibility that Obama is the puppet or front man for a much more sinister group playing fast and loose behind the scenes. However, the one thing you can’t deny is that the treasury is being raided, your freedoms are being destroyed, everyone’s taxes is going up – not that it matters because soon the dollar will be worthless, unemployment is rising, a war is purposely being lost and Obama is walking around without a clue except for his list of platitudes and what the teleprompter tells him to say.
Maybe this is one of those times you don’t follow the money, but follow the teleprompter.
Learn to live with reduced expectations
In an effort to deflect a rising frequency of calls for his resignation, U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner said that “the root source of our current troubles can be traced back to the Reagan Administration. Remember, it was the tax cuts and deregulation pushed by President Reagan that unleashed an abnormal expansion of economic growth. The American people became accustomed to an unhealthy pace of increasing material prosperity that is incompatible with the more socially conscious restraint President Obama is trying to bring to this country.”
“Rising home values, rising investment values, rising salaries all stimulate a sense of greed that is at odds with the type of new nation Obama is trying to build.” Geithner said, “This country was already on the path to learning to live with reduced expectations under President Carter until Reagan took us off the track.”
Geithner insisted that “those who criticize what we’re doing now to get back on track are deluded by an unrealistic optimism about the future. In most of the rest of the world people are much poorer than even Americans who are out of work. Accommodating to lower expectations and living standards is the path that the President has chosen for this country. The sooner people get with the program the easier it will be for all.”
Don’t you find it interesting that Obama felt the need to lie about his real goal of lowering expectations and living standards? Spread the misery – who could see that coming? I bet next time we’ll get a better definition of Change.
Wonder if Obama and his den of thieves are on the same road to poverty? Not a chance, but it does raise the question of how much of the stimulus package money found its way into personal bank accounts.
I mean, how hard is it to notice that the treasury is being looted?
by Geert Wilders
I come to America with a mission. All is not well in the old world. There is a tremendous danger looming, and it is very difficult to be optimistic. We might be in the final stages of the Islamization of Europe. This not only is a clear and present danger to the future of Europe itself, it is a threat to America and the sheer survival of the West. The United States as the last bastion of Western civilization, facing an Islamic Europe.
First I will describe the situation on the ground in Europe. Then, I will say a few things about Islam. To close I will tell you about a meeting in Jerusalem.
The Europe you know is changing.
You have probably seen the landmarks. But in all of these cities, sometimes a few blocks away from your tourist destination, there is another world. It is the world of the parallel society created by Muslim mass-migration.
All throughout Europe a new reality is rising: entire Muslim neighborhoods where very few indigenous people reside or are even seen. And if they are, they might regret it. This goes for the police as well. It’s the world of head scarves, where women walk around in figureless tents, with baby strollers and a group of children. Their husbands, or slaveholders if you prefer, walk three steps ahead. With mosques on many street corners. The shops have signs you and I cannot read. You will be hard-pressed to find any economic activity. These are Muslim ghettos controlled by religious fanatics. These are Muslim neighborhoods, and they are mushrooming in every city across Europe. These are the building-blocks for territorial control of increasingly larger portions of Europe, street by street, neighborhood by neighborhood, city by city.
There are now thousands of mosques throughout Europe. With larger congregations than there are in churches. And in every European city there are plans to build super-mosques that will dwarf every church in the region. Clearly, the signal is: we rule.
Many European cities are already one-quarter Muslim: just take Amsterdam, Marseille and Malmo in Sweden. In many cities the majority of the under-18 population is Muslim. Paris is now surrounded by a ring of Muslim neighborhoods. Mohammed is the most popular name among boys in many cities.
In some elementary schools in Amsterdam the farm can no longer be mentioned, because that would also mean mentioning the pig, and that would be an insult to Muslims.
Many state schools in Belgium and Denmark only serve halal food to all pupils. In once-tolerant Amsterdam gays are beaten up almost exclusively by Muslims. Non-Muslim women routinely hear ‘whore, whore’. Satellite dishes are not pointed to local TV stations, but to stations in the country of origin.
In France school teachers are advised to avoid authors deemed offensive to Muslims, including Voltaire and Diderot; the same is increasingly true of Darwin. The history of the Holocaust can no longer be taught because of Muslim sensitivity.
In England sharia courts are now officially part of the British legal system. Many neighborhoods in France are no-go areas for women without head scarves. Last week a man almost died after being beaten up by Muslims in Brussels, because he was drinking during the Ramadan.
Jews are fleeing France in record numbers, on the run for the worst wave of anti-Semitism since World War II. French is now commonly spoken on the streets of Tel Aviv and Netanya, Israel. I could go on forever with stories like this. Stories about Islamization.
A total of fifty-four million Muslims now live in Europe . San Diego University recently calculated that a staggering 25 percent of the population in Europe will be Muslim just 12 years from now. Bernhard Lewis has predicted a Muslim majority by the end of this century.
Now these are just numbers. And the numbers would not be threatening if the Muslim-immigrants had a strong desire to assimilate. But there are few signs of that. The Pew Research Center reported that half of French Muslims see their loyalty to Islam as greater than their loyalty to France . One-third of French Muslims do not object to suicide attacks. The British Centre for Social Cohesion reported that one-third of British Muslim students are in favor of a worldwide caliphate. Muslims demand what they call ‘respect’. And this is how we give them respect. We have Muslim official state holidays.
The Christian-Democratic attorney general is willing to accept sharia in the Netherlands if there is a Muslim majority. We have cabinet members with passports from Morocco and Turkey.
Muslim demands are supported by unlawful behavior, ranging from petty crimes and random violence, for example against ambulance workers and bus drivers, to small-scale riots. Paris has seen its uprising in the low-income suburbs, the banlieus. I call the perpetrators ’settlers’. Because that is what they are. They do not come to integrate into our societies; they come to integrate our society into their Dar-al-Islam. Therefore, they are settlers.
Much of this street violence I mentioned is directed exclusively against non-Muslims, forcing many native people to leave their neighborhoods, their cities, their countries. Moreover, Muslims are now a swing vote not to be ignored.
The second thing you need to know is the importance of Mohammed the prophet. His behavior is an example to all Muslims and cannot be criticized. Now, if Mohammed had been a man of peace, let us say like Ghandi and Mother Theresa wrapped in one, there would be no problem. But Mohammed was a warlord, a mass murderer, a pedophile, and had several marriages – at the same time. Islamic tradition tells us how he fought in battles, how he had his enemies murdered and even had prisoners of war executed. Mohammed himself slaughtered the Jewish tribe of Banu Qurayza. If it is good for Islam, it is good. If it is bad for Islam, it is bad.
Let no one fool you about Islam being a religion. Sure, it has a god, and a here-after, and 72 virgins. But in its essence Islam is a political ideology. It is a system that lays down detailed rules for society and the life of every person. Islam wants to dictate every aspect of life. Islam means ’submission’. Islam is not compatible with freedom and democracy, because what it strives for is sharia. If you want to compare Islam to anything, compare it to communism or national-socialism, these are all totalitarian ideologies.
Now you know why Winston Churchill called Islam ‘the most retrograde force in the world’, and why he compared Mein Kampf to the Quran. The public has wholeheartedly accepted the Palestinian narrative, and sees Israel as the aggressor. I have lived in this country and visited it dozens of times. I support Israel. First, because it is the Jewish homeland after two thousand years of exile up to and including Auschwitz, second because it is a democracy, and third because Israel is our first line of defense.
This tiny country is situated on the fault line of jihad, frustrating Islam’s territorial advance. Israel is facing the front lines of jihad, like Kashmir, Kosovo, the Philippines, Southern Thailand, Darfur in Sudan, Lebanon, and Aceh in Indonesia. Israel is simply in the way. The same way West-Berlin was during the Cold War.
The war against Israel is not a war against Israel . It is a war against the West. It is jihad. Israel is simply receiving the blows that are meant for all of us. If there would have been no Israel, Islamic imperialism would have found other venues to release its energy and its desire for conquest. Thanks to Israeli parents who send their children to the army and lay awake at night, parents in Europe and America can sleep well and dream, unaware of the dangers looming.
Many in Europe argue in favor of abandoning Israel in order to address the grievances of our Muslim minorities.. But if Israel were, God forbid, to go down, it would not bring any solace to the West It would not mean our Muslim minorities would all of a sudden change their behavior, and accept our values. On the contrary, the end of Israel would give enormous encouragement to the forces of Islam. They would, and rightly so, see the demise of Israel as proof that the West is weak, and doomed. The end of Israel would not mean the end of our problems with Islam, but only the beginning. It would mean the start of the final battle for world domination. If they can get Israel , they can get everything. So-called journalists volunteer to label any and all critics of Islamization as a ‘right-wing extremists’ or ‘racists’. In my country, the Netherlands , 60 percent of the population now sees the mass immigration of Muslims as the number one policy mistake since World War II. And another 60 percent sees Islam as the biggest threat. Yet there is a danger greater danger than terrorist attacks, the scenario of America as the last man standing. The lights may go out in Europe faster than you can imagine. An Islamic Europe means a Europe without freedom and democracy, an economic wasteland, an intellectual nightmare, and a loss of military might for America – as its allies will turn into enemies, enemies with atomic bombs. With an Islamic Europe, it would be up to America alone to preserve the heritage of Rome, Athens and Jerusalem.
Dear friends, liberty is the most precious of gifts. My generation never had to fight for this freedom, it was offered to us on a silver platter, by people who fought for it with their lives. All throughout Europe, American cemeteries remind us of the young boys who never made it home, and whose memory we cherish. My generation does not own this freedom; we are merely its custodians. We can only hand over this hard won liberty to Europe ’s children in the same state in which it was offered to us. We cannot strike a deal with mullahs and imams. Future generations would never forgive us. We cannot squander our liberties. We simply do not have the right to do so.
We have to take the necessary action now to stop this Islamic stupidity from destroying the free world that we know.
Islam, the religion of peace – talk about false advertising.
Think your government is going to stop the Islamic invasion without a wake-up jolt from a cattle prod, then think again. In fact, if western citizens don’t themselves take the bull by the horns all the governments will be Muslim.
Sheer numbers will see to that.
Don’t kid yourself free world, there’s no running away from this problem. You can grow a spine and do what it takes or wait for obscenities only a slave must tolerate.
Perhaps you can ask the Fort Hood 13 how they feel about it, but ask them loud.
It’s a long shout to Arlington National Cemetery.
The New McDonald’s UnHappy Meal
Is this something you could gaze upon while trying to enjoy the fast food experience?
This product packaging is a spoof and not something McDonald’s offers. If smart they never will.
What President in his right mind would try al-Qaeda terrorists in a civilian court?
Staging the trial in New York is not about punishing Khalid Sheikh Mohammed for his part in the 9/11 murders. Even feel-good liberals recognize this as Obama and Holder’s not-so-stealth attempt to put the Bush Administration on trial.
Some New Yorkers even agree and applaud Obama’s decision… at least those who haven’t considered the added incentive for New York to be hit again in the midst of this travesty.
Ahh, but what’s a few more burning buildings as long as the Ego of Mass Destruction can be satisfied.
What a vengeful and ungrateful little child we have as President.
Recent Comments